← Search

Melissa Raasch

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 60W–108L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Melissa Raasch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
L
2026-09-10 · ACP.Murphy · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Keen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-09 · KF.Ellis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michele Chambers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-02 · KF.Ellis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Dyvonne Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
Denise Wilson / Jill Cardella
2026-08-31 · ACP.Younkin · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Jee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-27 · ACP.Murphy · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with SIUHING LAI
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · KF.Ellis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Dyvonne Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-14 · TOC.Armstrong · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Keen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-10 · ACP.Younkin · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Lennon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · ACP.Qubeck · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bridgett Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · ACP.Qubeck · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Qubeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · TOC.Armstrong · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Younkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · TOC.Armstrong · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cyndy Fettig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
43.4%
36W–47L · 48.3% of games
3.5
25%
5W–15L · 40.7% of games
5.5
35.6%
16W–29L · 48.6% of games
6.5
7.1%
1W–13L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams