← Search

Beth Toth

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 74W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Toth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
L
2026-08-31 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Ide
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-10 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Welte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Bolinske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-27 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Welte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Welte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Welte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Welte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-01 · EM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Bolinske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-25 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Welte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-27 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Welte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · EM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Welte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-13 · EM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Trotter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.3% of games
2.5
66%
33W–17L · 59.3% of games
3.0
41.2%
21W–30L · 47.5% of games
6.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 65% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
70 matches
#1 Singles
16%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
6 matches
#1 Female Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer