← Search

Lesley Baker

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 87W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lesley Baker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
L
2026-08-24 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Younggren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-10 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ruth Mantle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Givens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
Jeff Smith / Stephanie Smith
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Tim Aberle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Eric Thompson / Marla Schroeder
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Tim Aberle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Lon Robbins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · GAC RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-20 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kris Stern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Givens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Givens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 81.4% of games
2.5
65.9%
27W–14L · 60.3% of games
3.0
46.2%
43W–50L · 47.4% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 80% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
12 matches
#1 Singles
7%
11 matches
#1 Female Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer