← Search

Cindy Sharp

MANAKIN SABOT, VA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 7W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Cindy Sharp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Ridgetop Pugh · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amanda Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · Ridgetop Pugh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with April Titler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Ridgetop Pugh · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nicole Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · Ridgetop Pugh 2.5 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Meredith Smart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · Ridgetop Pugh 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katharine Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-28 · Ridgetop Pugh 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amanda Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · Ridgetop Pugh 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nicole Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-22 · Ridgetop Pugh 2.5 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nicole Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-20 · Ridgetop Pugh 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amanda Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-08 · Ridgetop Pugh 2.5 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nicole Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-06 · Ridgetop Pugh 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lily VanElderen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-03 · 4 Ridgetop Pugh Tri-level · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teri Palin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 49.3% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 37.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe