← Search

Andrea Doyle

North Chesterfield, VA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 5W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Andrea Doyle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
W
2026-08-12 · Stonehenge Swingers · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Courtney Swecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-26 · Stonehenge Swingers · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Courtney Swecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-03 · Stonehenge - Sommers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jacqui Slayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · Stonehenge - Sommers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jocelyn Sommers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · Stonehenge - Sommers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jocelyn Sommers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-22 · Stonehenge - Sommers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emily Mehrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-03 · 15 Stonehenge Zambito · #3 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-06 · 15 Stonehenge Zambito · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-29 · 15 Stonehenge Zambito · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-09-22 · 15 Stonehenge Zambito · #2 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-05-29 · Stonehenge Danowski 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lexie Zambito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-22 · Stonehenge Danowski 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martha Pratt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
50%
5W–5L · 46.5% of games
6.0
0%
0W–4L · 30.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
3 matches
#1 Singles
14%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
1 match
#3 Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova