← Search

Mimi Luong

— year-end
43 matches · 31W–12L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mimi Luong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-08-02 · Scott-Luong/Rogers/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Gentry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · Femia/Lowell/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Cockrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · Scott-Luong/Rogers/SRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Buescher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-16 · Scott-Luong/Rogers/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Larimer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Scott-Luong/Rogers/SRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Cornett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · Femia/Lowell/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Short mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bianca Femia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · Femia/Lowell/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Short mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bianca Femia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-26 · Luong/Rogers/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-23 · Luong/Rogers/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 65.9% of games
4.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 52.9% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 64.9% of games
3.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.1% of games
4.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams