← Search

Jacob Cockrell

Cave Springs, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 23W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jacob Cockrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-08-12 · Smith-Cockrell/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaun Stacey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-24 · Femia/Lowell/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mimi Luong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · Schley/Springdale/MRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurel Schley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Mark Popejoy / Sarah White
2026-07-21 · Femia/Lowell/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bianca Femia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-19 · Schley/Springdale/MRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-25 · Smith-Cockrell/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaun Stacey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-10 · Femia/Lowell/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bianca Femia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · Cockrell/Bentonville/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaun Stacey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-01 · Cockrell/Bentonville/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sean Mahoney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · Cockrell/Bentonville/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sean Mahoney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · Cockrell/Bentonville/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Drew Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-04-07 · Cockrell/Bentonville/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 57.6% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.9% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 42.2% of games
3.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 67.8% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
10%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert