← Search

Martha Filipkowski

— year-end
57 matches · 20W–37L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Martha Filipkowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-08-30 · RoseRhody/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ginger Arthur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
Kate Dance / Mallory Wright
2026-05-16 · Smead/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Renee Trent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-16 · McKeehan-Hawkins/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhonda Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-03 · Rhody/Knoxville · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with LeighAnn Carlton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · Rhody/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renee Bagwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-04 · Smead/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jana Dovgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-04 · Rhody/Knoxville · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annette Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · McKeehan-Hawkins/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keri Brill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · Rhody/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with LeighAnn Carlton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-21 · Smead/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Renee Trent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-27 · McKeehanHawkins/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Keri Brill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-15 · Smead/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Paula Cutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 46.9% of games
3.0
22.2%
6W–21L · 35.3% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
3W–3L · 50.9% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer