← Search

Miriam Waters

Raleigh, NC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 70W–94L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Miriam Waters to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history164 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Ki.Manning40C5.5 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michelle Metelo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-30 · St.Fogarty18C5.5 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lanier McRee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-29 · TOC.Grasser · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tracy Grasser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-09 · St.Fogarty18C5.5 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kristen Duke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Stacey Mantooth / Amy Mills
2026-08-08 · TOC.Grasser · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kristen Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-05 · Ki.Manning40C5.5 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michelle Metelo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · La.McRee40S · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-02 · St.Fogarty18C5.5 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michelle Metelo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-29 · St.Fogarty18S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · La.McRee40S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · Ki.Manning18T · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Elizabeth Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-09 · Ki.Manning18T · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shannon Aumer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
53.8%
42W–36L · 51.9% of games
3.0
29.3%
17W–41L · 41.3% of games
5.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 46.5% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 21% of the time
#3 Doubles
21%
35 matches
#1 Singles
21%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
26 matches
#3 Singles
12%
19 matches
#2 Singles
10%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe