← Search

Meredith Bazemore

Chapel Hill, NC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 28W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Meredith Bazemore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-09-12 · ACP.White · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sarah London
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-09-12 · ABoone-BP · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Stephanie Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
Patsy Park / Susan Kim
2026-09-06 · ABoone-BP · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meghan Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-31 · MBlake-TOCH · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Liza Terll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-29 · ACP.White · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sarah London
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-24 · MBlake-TOCH · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ann Laros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · ACP.White · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Liza Terll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-22 · ABoone-BP · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meghan Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · ABoone-TOCH · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Dana Crotts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
Amanda Laird / Susan Kim
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Dana Crotts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · ACP.White · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Dianna White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · ABoone-BP · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Liza Terll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 48% of games
3.0
39.4%
13W–20L · 43.6% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#1 Singles
14%
8 matches
#2 Singles
14%
8 matches
#3 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King