← Search

Brittany Savoca

Wilmington, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 28W–19L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Brittany Savoca to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Holleman/Smith 18+ 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carol Drennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-02 · Holleman/Smith 18+ 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carol Drennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-31 · Waddle 18+ 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Straub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-27 · Young 18s · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Isenhour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-26 · Waddle 18+ 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katherine Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · Young 18s · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Isenhour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-23 · Hopson trilevel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Hanly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · Waddle 18+ 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Straub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · Senter/Savoca · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Skane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-31 · Hopson trilevel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Senter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-29 · Brandkamp · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gino Galutera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Senter/Savoca · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Armeni mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 59.2% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.3% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.5% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.5% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 32.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova