← Search

Christopher Kandl

Richmond, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 29W–12L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Christopher Kandl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-07-15 · ACAC Curtis · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Raven Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · ACAC Jones and Townsend 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · ACAC Curtis · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ashley Curtis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · ACAC Jones and Townsend 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-20 · ACAC Jones and Townsend 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daryl Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · ACAC Jones/Townsend 3.0 WeekEND · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · ACAC Jones/Townsend 3.0 WeekEND · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daryl Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4
W
2026-05-02 · ACAC Jones/Townsend 3.0 WeekEND · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-11 · ACAC Jones/Townsend 3.0 WeekEND · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ken Lowenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-03-07 · 2 ACAC Lewis/Pfeiffer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kate Zachry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-16 · 2 ACAC Lewis/Pfeiffer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kate Zachry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-10 · 2 ACAC Lewis/Pfeiffer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kate Zachry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 65.3% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.9% of games
5.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.6% of games
6.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.1% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert