← Search

Darrell Eakes

North Chesterfield, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 33W–43L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Darrell Eakes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-09-06 · ACAC Jones/Kasten Weekend · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dave Booth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-23 · ACAC Jones/Kasten Weekend · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dave Booth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · ACAC V/Kasten · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reginald Tabor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-3
L
2026-07-20 · ACAC V/Kasten · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · CORA - Cargiulo · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Horning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · ACAC V/Kasten · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Alcorta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · CORA - Cargiulo · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Horning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-21 · ACAC V/Kasten · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-20 · ACAC V/Kasten · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Mulligan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-07 · ACAC Overserved 3.0 Kasten · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eddie Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-31 · Chestnut Oaks - Cargiulo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Kasten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · ACAC Overserved 3.0 Kasten · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eddie Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
50%
8W–8L · 56.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 34% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 48.1% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.1%
18W–11L · 53.9% of games
7.5mixed
30%
3W–7L · 43.7% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams