← Search

Penny Schmitt

— year-end
107 matches · 72W–35L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Penny Schmitt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-08-16 · NMT: Acing Gracefully: Rose · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian McCauley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · 4S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · 4S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · NMT: Acing Gracefully: Rose · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Hill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · 4S:Perfectly Matched:Giff/Rose · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Giff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · NMT: Acing Gracefully: Rose · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Hill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · 4S:Summer Vibes:Buono · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Flavia Lodato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-03 · 4S:Summer Vibes:Buono · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Bednar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · 4S:Swift Reactions 18+:Casenave/Dicandido · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Pratt-Heaney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-26 · 4S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eva Ortiz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · 4S:Perfectly Matched:Giff/Rose · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracy Haddad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · 4S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Lash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams39 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
58.8%
20W–14L · 55.4% of games
3.5
68.6%
24W–11L · 56.1% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 55.4% of games
7.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 62.3% of games
7.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova