← Search

Flavia Lodato

Ridgefield, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 81W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Flavia Lodato to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
W
2026-07-19 · 4S:Summer Vibes:Buono · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah OMalley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-6
W
2026-06-14 · 4S:Summer Vibes:Buono · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Penny Schmitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-07 · 4S:Summer Vibes:Buono · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carola Cazenave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-02 · 4S:Mixed Nuts 18+:Schmidt/Cazenave · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dan Lombardo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · 4S:Mixed Nuts 18+:Schmidt/Cazenave · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dan Lombardo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-03-01 · 4S:Good Vibes:Ortiz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah OMalley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-01-30 · CP:Serve Me A Double:Hodgson/Huber · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-2
L
2026-01-24 · 4S:Good Vibes:Ortiz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Amadeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-5
W
2026-01-04 · 4S:Good Vibes:Ortiz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Amadeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-12-13 · 4S:Mixed Nuts:Schmidt/Cazenave · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Ortiz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-11-23 · 4S:Trifecta:Lodato/Amadeo · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Amadeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2025-11-14 · CP:Serve Me A Double:Hodgson/Huber · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Isabela Rizo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 64.9% of games
3.5
58.9%
63W–44L · 54.6% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 38.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.9% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
20 matches
#1 Singles
14%
18 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova