← Search

Jasper Smits

Austin, TX
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 44W–33L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jasper Smits to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-06-21 · Hit Deep · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justin Murrill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-07 · Hit Deep · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brendan Fang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · Wunderdogs · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jill Coody Smits mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · Hit Deep · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
David Phillips / Drew Patrizi
2026-04-19 · Hit Deep · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tommy Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-29 · Wunderdogs · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Adriana Urmeneta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-15 · Wunderdogs · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ashlyn Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · Smash Bros 4.5 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marc Parrish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-22 · Smash Bros 4.5 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Demerath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
Charles Ballard / David Phillips
2026-02-08 · Smash Bros 4.5 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tommy Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-08 · Wunderdogs · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ashley Ingle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-18 · Smash Bros 4.5 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Barton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
81%
17W–4L · 57.6% of games
4.5
50%
15W–15L · 49.9% of games
8.0mixed
54.5%
12W–10L · 52.6% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova