Jane Ford
Chicago, IL
139 matches · 94W–45L · seasons 2020–2026
Captains: add Jane Ford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history139 matches
W
Julie Glatz / Christie Heinlen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Lina Kamenev / Kristin Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 6.RT Ellison Sun 6 $29
CHI E 40W4.0 2.RT Fuller Sun 12 $29
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 3RT Fuller Sun 2 $27
CDTA S ComboW7.5 3.Gnvw Sangal Mon 7 $21
CDTA S ComboX7.5 5.RT Spinazze Sat 7 $27
CDTA S TriWLo 5.RT Ford Sat 2 $27
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 1.RT Fuller Sun 12 $27
CDTA W ComboW7.5 1.Gnvw Sangal Sun 5 $21
CDTA W ComboX7.5 2.RT Spinazze Sat 7 $2
CDTA W TriWLo 1.RT Ford Sat 2 $27
CHI F CW7.5 1.Gnvw Sangal Sun 5 $21
NITA E 40W18b River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
NITA S 35W18b River Trails-Lam
NITA S 35W40 Wilmette-Lam
NITA S 40W18d River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
NITA W 35W18d River Trails-Lam
NITA W 35W40f Wilmette-Lam
NITA W 40W18d River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 58.8% of games
3.5
69.8%
44W–19L · 56.7% of games
4.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.4% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 48.3% of games
7.5mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 60.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.