← Search

Lea Parks

— year-end
65 matches · 38W–27L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Lea Parks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
Karen Collins / Linda Bui
2026-08-29 · ParksSpurgin/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carolina Lyngh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-27 · Gomes/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Crook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · ParksSpurgin/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Mcclenagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-25 · Parks/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Parks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-12 · Parks /Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brett Carroll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
Amy Alspaugh / Dan Vanhoozer
2026-06-29 · Parks /Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Parks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
Alyssa Maddox / Niles Maddox
2026-06-20 · Parks/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Parks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-18 · Parks/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brook Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-09 · Cook-Landry/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bailey Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-27 · Parks/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Megan Parker / Anne Marie Rasmussen
2026-04-20 · Parks/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-13 · Parks/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Hoskins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Teams31 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 67.3% of games
3.0
48%
12W–13L · 51.9% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
70%
7W–3L · 62.9% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe