← Search

Emily Mcclenagan

Knoxville, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 72W–13L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Emily Mcclenagan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
Mallory Hearl / Courtney Choo
2026-08-25 · GomesSpurgin/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenna Gomes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · GomesSpurgin/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenna Gomes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · ParksSpurgin/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lea Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
Daniel Moon / Isha Patel
2026-07-26 · Berning/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with RD McClenagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-28 · Berning/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with RD McClenagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-22 · WebbLake/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thuy Duong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Heather Wilson / Jill Hoschette
2026-05-21 · Spurgin/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolina Lyngh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-15 · WebbLake/Knoxville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-14 · Spurgin/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Kitchiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Jill Hoschette / Melanie Johnson
2026-05-08 · WebbLake/Knoxville · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vallie Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-06 · Gomes-Spurgin · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-29 · Gomes-Spurgin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenna Gomes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
90%
9W–1L · 76.6% of games
3.0
100%
16W–0L · 72.3% of games
3.5
85.4%
35W–6L · 61.2% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 63.5% of games
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#2 Singles
9%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams