← Search

Delaney Rhodus

Richmond, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 132W–86L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Delaney Rhodus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history218 matches
L
2026-09-02 · MAC - Messmer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Haener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-30 · MAC Rhodus 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sonya Carman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-29 · MAC Rhodus 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine McDowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-08-26 · MAC - Messmer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Haener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · MAC Rhodus 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lindsay Bazydlo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · MAC - Messmer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nina Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-09 · MAC Rhodus 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lindsay Bazydlo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-01 · MAC Rhodus 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sonya Carman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · Burkwood Decker · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nina Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · Burkwood Decker · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Haener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-16 · Burkwood Decker · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Haener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-14 · Burkwood Decker · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pamla Dietz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
4.0
77.8%
28W–8L · 62.7% of games
4.5
50%
18W–18L · 52.2% of games
7.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 60.2% of games
8.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 52.9% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.5% of games
7.5mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 65% of games
8.0mixed
50%
19W–19L · 53.2% of games
8.5mixed
51.9%
14W–13L · 55.2% of games
9.0mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
71 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
57 matches
#2 Singles
9%
19 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova