← Search

Ridley Stallings

— year-end
19 matches · 13W–6L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Ridley Stallings to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
W
2026-09-01 · SCC - Masterson/Avendano · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Seeger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · SCC - Masterson/Avendano · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christa McCurry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-13 · SCC - Masterson/Avendano · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Seeger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-12-13 · SCC-Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-17 · SCC - Wilson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Solomon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2025-07-10 · SCC - Wilson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Whitfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-26 · SCC - Wilson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-06-19 · SCC - Wilson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Farina Kingsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-03-21 · SCC/SYC-Brooks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-03-07 · SCC/SYC-Brooks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-03-02 · SATA/Marc Frischer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-23 · SATA/Marc Frischer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Teams15 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 56.7% of games
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.6% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 45.5% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 84% of the time
#1 Doubles
84%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams