← Search

Reggie Oakley

Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 56W–103L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Reggie Oakley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
L
2026-09-01 · ROakley.6.5C-EV · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bart Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-25 · ROakley.6.5C-EV · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bart Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-11 · ROakley.6.5C-EV · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chris Reeves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-01 · TEdwards-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tynita Edwards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · TEdwards-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Stefan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-20 · TEdwards-HS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Holt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-29 · DNagelhout-HS · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-15 · DNagelhout-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Russell Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-09 · KBuckel-EV · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-08 · DNagelhout-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dirk Kumashiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-03 · KBuckel-EV · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephen Pysnik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Hasan Abdullah / Wenkai Yu
2026-03-26 · KBuckel-EV · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
39.7%
29W–44L · 46.3% of games
3.5
25%
5W–15L · 36.6% of games
6.5
32.6%
14W–29L · 44.3% of games
3.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 53.8% of games
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.9% of games
6.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 43.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
17 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#3 Singles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova