← Search

Jeff Denhard

Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 49W–54L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jeff Denhard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-08-29 · MHolt-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-20 · MHolt-DUR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · DNagelhout.40C-HS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Valdis Stiebris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · TEdwards-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Stefan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · DLiller-HS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dori Liller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · DLiller-HS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dori Liller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · TEdwards-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Nagelhout mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-15 · DLiller-HS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Nagelhout mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-20 · TEdwards-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tynita Edwards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
Buck Phillips / Thomas Miller
2026-04-29 · DNagelhout-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andy Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Nagelhout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Adam Hantman / Josh Gouker - (DQ)
2026-04-15 · DNagelhout-HS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Evert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
43.6%
17W–22L · 48.7% of games
6.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 40.4% of games
3.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 47.6% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 64.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer