← Search

Kendall Spaght

— year-end
109 matches · 78W–31L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kendall Spaght to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-07-12 · MIT:Bulldogs:Zazzera · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Sax
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-05 · MIT:Bulldogs:Zazzera · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Sax
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · MIT:Bulldogs:Zazzera · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Sax
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · MIT:Bulldogs:Zazzera · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurent Zazzera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-07 · MIT:Bulldogs:Zazzera · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lue Villa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-30 · MIT:Bulldogs:Zazzera · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurent Zazzera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-25 · #2 Doubles · with Lee Wolfe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-6
L
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · with John Guthrie championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-8
L
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · with Lee Wolfe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-9
L
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · with Lee Wolfe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-8
W
2026-05-17 · MIT:Bulldogs:Zazzera · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Sax
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · MIT:Bulldogs:Zazzera · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurent Zazzera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
Teams27 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
77.1%
37W–11L · 60.7% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57.6% of games
7.0mixed
82.1%
32W–7L · 61% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
3%
3 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova