← Search

Michael Nolan

— year-end
135 matches · 85W–50L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Michael Nolan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-08-30 · MRC:Hawley/Berger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Hawley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · MRC:Hawley/Berger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Hawley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · MRC:Hit Men:Spratto · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Trudeau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-01 · MRC: Senior Service:Berger/McCauley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · MRC:Hit Men:Spratto · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Trudeau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-14 · MRC:Hit Men:Spratto · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ed Soto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · MRC:Hit Men:Spratto · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Trudeau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-23 · BSF:Polhamus/Burwood · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Trudeau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-03 · MRC: Senior Service:Berger/McCauley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian McCauley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · BSF:Polhamus · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Polhamus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · BSF:Polhamus/Burwood · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stuart Burwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · MRC:Schwarz/Quinn · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Viscera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 6-2
Teams33 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 62.2% of games
3.5
65.6%
40W–21L · 56.6% of games
4.0
40%
10W–15L · 44% of games
7.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 53.4% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
13 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King