← Search

Kelly Conklin

Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 71W–81L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kelly Conklin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · with Will Gresham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · CPipkin-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirby Jethro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-3
W
2026-07-16 · JYoung-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dylan White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-0
L
2026-07-12 · CPipkin-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristina Raiti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-18 · JYoung-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dylan White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
Erin Miller
2026-06-16 · KConklin-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · CPipkin-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirby Jethro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Jeff Pobst / CLARE MURRAY
2026-06-04 · JYoung-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Will Gresham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · KConklin-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-24 · CPipkin-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with RANEE KUMAR
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-12 · KConklin-DUR · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-05 · KConklin-DUR · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
41.9%
26W–36L · 48.7% of games
3.5
26.7%
8W–22L · 38.2% of games
5.5
62.5%
15W–9L · 57.9% of games
6.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 48.8% of games
3.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 51.9% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#1 Singles
16%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
17 matches
#2 Singles
7%
11 matches
#3 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova