← Search

Yolanda Deaver

Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
297 matches · 203W–94L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Yolanda Deaver to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history297 matches
W
2026-09-03 · JHagerty.55C-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathy Reedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-02 · GLofrese.40.6.5-TOCH · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kellianne White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-29 · DBaker.40C-TOCH · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Emily Patulski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Beth Johnson / Susana Harvey
2026-08-13 · JHagerty.55C-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Virginia Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-08 · DBaker.40C-TOCH · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amy Singer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-06 · JHagerty.55C-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Chaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-05 · GLofrese.40.6.5-TOCH · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-20 · CP.Knudson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stanley Brugler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · CP.Knudson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stanley Brugler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · DBaker-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Ranheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · EHoover-YMCA · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-07-08 · DBaker-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Ranheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 59.5% of games
3.0
77.2%
95W–28L · 59.9% of games
3.5
56%
14W–11L · 52.3% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
69.1%
38W–17L · 59.1% of games
6.5
60%
15W–10L · 51.9% of games
3.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.5% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
110 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
103 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
67 matches
#1 Singles
3%
10 matches
#3 Singles
1%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer