← Search

Jodi Radius

Ocean Springs, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 55W–62L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jodi Radius to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Blevins TOCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-09 · TOCC Render-Leach - 40s · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kara Blevins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-26 · TOCC Render-Leach - 40s · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kara Blevins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-24 · Blevins TOCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Madison Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-19 · Blevins TOCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Madison Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-05 · Blevins TOCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Pilger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · Blevins TOCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Spencer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-30 · Blevins TOCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · Blevins TOCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allene Balgord
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-15 · BlevinsTOCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Gabardi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · Blevins TOCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · Blevins TOCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 50.2% of games
3.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 57.3% of games
3.5
41.4%
12W–17L · 47.1% of games
6.5
51.5%
17W–16L · 51.8% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 72% of games
3.5mixed
20%
2W–8L · 44.6% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer