← Search

Andrea May

Biloxi, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 64W–37L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Andrea May to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Biloxi - Foley · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Delynsi Che
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · Biloxi - Foley · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Brandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-09-02 · Blx - McCarroll · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Torria Dale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-27 · Biloxi - Foley · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Brandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Blx - McCarroll · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooke Spring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-3
W
2026-08-05 · Blevins TOCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi St. Amant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-31 · Blevins TOCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Maisano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · Blevins TOCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi Radius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · Blevins TOCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Maisano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-19 · TOCC Render-Leach 40s · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Descher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · Blevins TOCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Render-Leach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-15 · Blevins TOCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi Radius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60%
12W–8L · 52.6% of games
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 62.9% of games
4.0
50%
15W–15L · 46.2% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
77.3%
17W–5L · 60% of games
4.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#1 Singles
11%
11 matches
#2 Singles
9%
9 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe