← Search

Antje Vennemann

Birmingham, MI
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 41W–16L · seasons 2020–2025

Captains: add Antje Vennemann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
L
2025-11-16 · 3LT-Marvel-Nelson 75 WOMEN COMBO F1 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Costabile
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-25 · 3LT-Marvel-Nelson 75 WOMEN COMBO F1 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Costabile
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-18 · 3BT- Farwell 40 WOMEN fall SINGLES F1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-1
L
2025-10-12 · 3BT- Farwell 40 WOMEN fall SINGLES F1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-04 · 3LT-Marvel-Nelson 75 WOMEN COMBO F1 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Costabile
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2025-03-23 · 3BLOOM-FARWELL 4.0 women win singles SEM F · #3 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-1
L
2025-03-02 · 3BLOOM-FARWELL 4.0 women win singles SEM F · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-1
L
2025-01-31 · 3BLOOM-FARWELL 4.0 women win singles SEM F · #2 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-5
L
2024-07-18 · 1WESS-BARRY AD40&O TH 40 NW SEM F2 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Selasky-Bennie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-2
W
2024-06-20 · 1WESS-BARRY AD40&O TH 40 NW SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Calkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-13 · 1WESS-BARRY AD40&O TH 40 NW SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Mosher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2024-06-06 · 1WESS-BARRY AD40&O TH 40 NW SEM F2 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Mendola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2025
3BLOOM-FARWELL 4.0 women win singles SEM F
2025 aSEM WINTER TEAM SINGLES · 2025 WOMEN 4.0 WINTER SINGLES SEM
2025
3BT- Farwell 40 WOMEN fall SINGLES F1
2025 cSEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · WOMEN 4.0 SINGLES SEM
2025
3LT-Marvel-Nelson 75 WOMEN COMBO F1
2025 cSEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 75 COMBO SEM
2025
1WESS-BARRY AD40&O TH 40 NW SEM F2
2024 SEM ADULT 40 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 4.0 WOMEN THUR PM SEM · 40+
2024
4WESS-DEMERINO Winter Team Singles 4.0 W SEM F2
2024 zSEM WINTER TEAM SINGLES · 2024 WOMEN 4.0 WINTER SINGLES SEM
2024
1BRC-SCOTT AD18&O MO 35NW SEM F2
2023 SEM ADULT 18 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 3.5 WOMEN MON PM SEM · 18+
2023
2TROY-LIVINGSTON 7.5W COMBO SEM F3
2023 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 75 COMBO SEM
2023
5BRC-SNELL AD18&O 40NW TU SEM F1
2023 SEM ADULT 18 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 4.0 WOMEN TUES PM SEM · 18+
2023
2BRC-SCOTT 35NW 18&O AD MON SEM F1
2022 SEM ADULT 18 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 3.5 WOMEN MON PM SEM · 18+
2022
3LIFE-ANDERSON D2 WE W tri-level showdown f2
2022 SEM MICHIGAN SHOWDOWN - TRI-LEVEL · 2022 D2 WE W 7.0 6.0 5.0 SEMI SHOWDOWN TRI-LEVEL
2022
4BRC-SCOTT Winter 3.5 women singles sem f2
2022 SEM TEAM SINGLES - WINTER · 2022 WOMEN 3.5 WINTER SINGLES SEM
2022
4LIFE-ANDERSON 7.0 18&O MIXED SEM F3
2022 SEM MIXED SUMMER 18 & OVER · 7.0 SEM SUM MIX 18 & OVER · 18+
2022
5LIFE-MARVELNELSON 35NW 40&O AD WED SEM F4
2022 SEM ADULT 40 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 3.5 WOMEN WED PM SEM · 40+
2022
5LTF-ANDERSON 65 W/E WOMEN SEM F2
2022 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM
2022
6BRC-SCOTT 35 W/E WOMEN SINGLES SEM F2
2022 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · WOMEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM
2022
4LIFE-ANDERSON 65WW COMBO SEM F4
2021 aSEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM
2021
6BRC-SCOTT 35 W sing sem f2
2021 aSEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · WOMEN 3.5 SINGLES SEM
2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
85%
17W–3L · 68.2% of games
4.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 50% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 53% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#2 Singles
16%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#3 Singles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer