← Search

Rob Sellick

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 57W–53L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Rob Sellick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
W
2026-08-16 · Ti.Koves18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeffrey Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · Ro.Sellick18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zachary Matteen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-04 · Ro.Sellick18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Daigle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-31 · Ro.Sellick18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Will Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · Ro.Sellick18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zachary Matteen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-18 · Ro.Sellick40A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-11 · Ro.Sellick40A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-05 · Mi.Elstob18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradford Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · Mi.Elstob18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradford Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-04-13 · Ro.Sellick40A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-26 · Mi.Elstob18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Koves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-22 · Mi.Elstob18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradford Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
55.7%
34W–27L · 50.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–12L · 31.1% of games
6.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 63.4% of games
7.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 46.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
24 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert