← Search

Zachary Matteen

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 19W–15L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Zachary Matteen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-07-30 · Ro.Sellick18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Sellick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-23 · Ro.Sellick18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Daigle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-09 · Ro.Sellick18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rex Bickley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-02 · Ro.Sellick18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Will Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Ro.Sellick18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-28 · Ro.Sellick18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Sellick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
Cameron Burch / Ian Campbell
2026-05-03 · Za.Matteen18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Ritter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-26 · Za.Matteen18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angelo Mathay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-01 · Za.Matteen18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nat Rew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-2
L
2025-05-17 · To.Orban18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Ritter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
Anthony Womack / Alan McSwain
2025-04-27 · To.Orban18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Cockrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-04-13 · To.Orban18A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Cockrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
40.9%
9W–13L · 43.6% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
90%
9W–1L · 58% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova