← Search

JP Jamison

Lincoln, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 53W–65L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add JP Jamison to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
L
2026-06-22 · Mandigo/Moguel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ed Kirkwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-08 · Mandigo/Moguel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Mandigo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · NEWC/Green/55&Over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gareth Canaan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
Bill Moates / Andrew Nguyen
2026-05-19 · Mandigo/Moguel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Mandigo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · NEWC/Green/55&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rodney Ware
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-11 · Mandigo/Moguel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Hung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-09 · NEWC/Green/55&Over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rodney Ware
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-05 · Mandigo/Moguel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Hung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-02 · NEWC/Green/55&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Sunderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-04 · Ek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Ek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-01 · Green/Ware · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Tabor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-27 · Stoupa · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Herita Akamah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.1% of games
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
33.9%
20W–39L · 44% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 48.6% of games
7.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 59.1% of games
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 42.9% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 68.4% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert