← Search

Herita Akamah

Lincoln, NE
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 89W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Herita Akamah to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Hohlen Tegler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Mueller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · Hohlen Tegler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacia Thiesen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-10 · Lubben/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Aaron Ogden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · NE/Akamah/18&Over4.5W · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-27 · NE/VuuTegler/18&Over8.0X · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Vuu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · NE/Akamah/18&Over4.5W · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-03 · NE/Akamah/18&Over4.5W · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · Lubben/Freeman · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Justin Brinkman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-13 · NE/Akamah/18&Over4.5W · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-06 · NE/Akamah/18&Over4.5W · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · Akamah/Gradoville · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Francine Bruening
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-29 · Akamah/Gradoville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Stai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 56.4% of games
4.5
63%
51W–30L · 55.4% of games
8.0mixed
53.3%
16W–14L · 52.8% of games
9.0mixed
56%
14W–11L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
29 matches
#1 Singles
15%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
21 matches
#2 Singles
11%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer