← Search

Aileen Stacy

Charleston, WV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 36W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Aileen Stacy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-04-14 · CTC Cross · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lilah Michael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-12 · CTC Cross · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Cross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-03-22 · CTC Cross · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal Bastin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-02-22 · CTC Cross · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lilah Michael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Stacey Smith / Loretta Dailey
2026-02-07 · CTC Cross · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lilah Michael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-24 · CTC Cross · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal Bastin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-11-20 · CTC Greene · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Erlewine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-10-13 · CTC Greene · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gwyneth Owen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-10-02 · CTC Greene · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Paige Missler / Jamie Schmidt
2024-09-21 · CTC Greene · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Waybright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-04-19 · CTC Schulz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Ratrie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-03-02 · CTC Schulz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Spriggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
72.4%
21W–8L · 56.8% of games
4.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 48.6% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#1 Singles
20%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#2 Singles
19%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer