← Search

Kiersten Lake

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 75W–60L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kiersten Lake to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-06-14 · SHC-Hobi · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris van Leeuwen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-26 · SHC-Hobi · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheena Raffaele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-18 · SHC-Hobi · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Creps Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · with Andrea Hobi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · with Andrea Hobi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · with Andrea Hobi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Maguire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-08 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Korenek-Leveque
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-28 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris van Leeuwen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-01-10 · N OR-SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-22 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris van Leeuwen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-11-15 · SHC-Welter/Eargle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Korenek-Leveque
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
60%
12W–8L · 55.7% of games
3.5
60.8%
31W–20L · 53.6% of games
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 50.7% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 60.3% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
36.7%
11W–19L · 48% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
26 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe