← Search

Mitchell Nadel

— year-end
102 matches · 58W–44L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Mitchell Nadel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Grand Slam 18+ 4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kunal Maini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · SOL: Wise Aces: Nair/Gillott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adrian Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-16 · SUNY Net Magic 40+ 4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dale Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · Grand Slam 18+ 4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edgar Torres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-09 · SUNY Net Magic 40+ 4.0M · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · SOL: Wise Aces: Nair/Gillott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Tamis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-04 · Grand Slam 18+ 4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Kukuruza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-28 · Grand Slam 18+ 4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dale Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-21 · Grand Slam 18+ 4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dale Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-0
L
2026-05-17 · SOL: Wise Aces: Nair/Gillott · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Distefano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-30 · Grand Slam 18+ 4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rudy Loyero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · SUNY Net Magic 40+ 4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dale Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams24 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
81%
17W–4L · 62.4% of games
4.0
49.3%
36W–37L · 51.4% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#1 Singles
10%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer