← Search

Dale Kim

Stamford, CT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 78W–30L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Dale Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-07-16 · Grand Slam 18+ 4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robby Woodbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · KH: Whalers: Presley/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dave Jia Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · Grand Slam 18+ 4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew So
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-08 · KH: Whalers: Presley/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Katis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · SUNY Net Magic 40+ 4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew So
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · with Dave Jia Li championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Dave Jia Li championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Michael Boardman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · SUNY Net Magic 40+ 4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew So
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · Grand Slam 18+ 4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew So
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-16 · SUNY Net Magic 40+ 4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitchell Nadel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · KH: Whalers: Presley/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rishi Narang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
72.3%
60W–23L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 62% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova