← Search

Lacey Shannon

— year-end
33 matches · 29W–4L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lacey Shannon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
2026-03-23 · Tough Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-0
W
2026-03-16 · Tough Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-23 · Tough Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Callie Musselman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-19 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Swaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-12 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carlisle Swann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-22 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-01-15 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Almaraz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-16 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Almaraz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-10-06 · Alamo Heights Tough Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bonnie Chumbley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
Diana Rendon / Kathleen Johnson
2025-09-18 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Rogers Fitch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-09-15 · Alamo Heights Tough Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirstin Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-09-11 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Almaraz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
87.5%
28W–4L · 64.8% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova