← Search

Amanda Falsone

Raleigh, NC
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
24 matches · 5W–19L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Amanda Falsone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-05-19 · Sa.Kane40A · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-14 · Sa.Kane40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-24 · Sa.Kane40A · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-10 · Ma.Basil40C · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Noelle Hagen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-09-24 · Mo.Goodrich18S · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2025-09-17 · Mo.Goodrich18S · #2 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Julie Shaw / Bess Pitt
2025-08-26 · Ma.Basil40C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tina Santospago
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-02 · Li.Taylor40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Noelle Hagen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Emily Tripp / Ellen Nespeca
2025-03-25 · Li.Taylor40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Santospago
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Amy Baker / Kelly Burkhardt
2024-10-01 · Me.Heath18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Celia Whited
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Heather Saitta / Amy Gadke
2024-09-23 · Me.Heath18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with MaryAdelaide Riddick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-08-21 · Ma.Riddick18C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meagan Heath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.4% of games
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 36.8% of games
5.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 45.8% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#1 Singles
13%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer