← Search

Kristin Esham

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 89W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kristin Esham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Ma.Zimardo40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Denise Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · Ma.Zimardo40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Zimardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · Ma.Gonella18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · Ma.Zimardo18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · Ma.Zimardo18S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Ma.Gonella18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zoe Whitesell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · Ma.Gonella18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · Ma.Gonella18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · Ma.Zimardo18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Ma.Gonella18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zoe Whitesell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-26 · #2 Doubles · with Anne Enberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
52.1%
25W–23L · 52.2% of games
3.0
68.5%
37W–17L · 59.8% of games
3.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 40.1% of games
5.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 54.6% of games
6.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 53% of games
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 34.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
25 matches
#1 Singles
14%
22 matches
#2 Singles
10%
16 matches
#3 Singles
8%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer