← Search

Elizabeth Olsgaard

Columbia, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 57W–11L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Olsgaard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
2026-09-08 · CTL18/COWARD/CTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelsey Hartvigsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-27 · CTL18/Peterson/CTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caty Garside
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · CTL18/COWARD/CTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Juanita Cooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-03 · CTL18/Dye/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Olsgaard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-13 · CTL18/Dye/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Olsgaard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-06 · CTL18/Dye/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Olsgaard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-24 · CTL (B) 3.5W 18 & Over (Coward) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Coward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-17 · CTL (B) 3.5W 18 & Over (Coward) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-10 · CTL (B) 3.5W 18 & Over (Coward) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-24 · CTL (B) 3.5W 18 & Over (Coward) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-17 · CTL (B) 3.5W 18 & Over (Coward) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-10 · CTL (B) 3.5W 18 & Over (Coward) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
8W–0L · 68.1% of games
3.0
82.6%
19W–4L · 67.2% of games
3.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 63.5% of games
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 88.2% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 58.8% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 72.9% of games
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe