← Search

Barbie Heckenberger

Madison, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 53W–24L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Barbie Heckenberger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-09-09 · King, Chase · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chase King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
Nancy Thompson / Kelly Crockett
2026-08-26 · King, Chase · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · King, Chase · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lavonne Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-05 · King, Chase · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrea Hart-Crovetto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · Sims, Lavonne · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Julie Denton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · Sims, Lavonne · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Beth Noland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Esther Young / Gabrielle Sioufi
2026-04-10 · Ruhl, Allison · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle David
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-03-26 · Ruhl, Allison · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sage Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-05 · Ruhl, Allison · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-05 · Ruhl, Allison · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Noland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-13 · Ruhl, Allison · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mindy Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-09-17 · Ruhl, Allison · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.4% of games
3.0
70.6%
24W–10L · 56.3% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.2% of games
5.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 74.4% of games
6.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal