← Search

Kaitlin Lamack

— year-end
104 matches · 50W–54L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Kaitlin Lamack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Hoxsey 4.0W (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Haas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Hensley-Birky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-29 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Haas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-03-22 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Hensley-Birky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-22 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Hensley-Birky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-15 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Inman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-02-01 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-01-11 · Hoxsey (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Hensley-Birky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-04 · Hoxsey (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-23 · Hoxsey (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kallie Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
55.6%
30W–24L · 51.2% of games
4.0
40%
20W–30L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
27 matches
#2 Singles
7%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal