← Search

Caroline Haas

Saint Louis, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 83W–119L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Caroline Haas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history202 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Hoxsey 4.0W (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Lamack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-19 · Kellogg/Grassle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Grassle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · Kellogg/Grassle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Dubberke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaitlin Lamack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaitlin Lamack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-03-28 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Lamack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2
L
2026-03-08 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Dubberke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-02-22 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-01-18 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Hensley-Birky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-04 · Hoxsey (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kallie Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-12-14 · Hoxsey (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elena Breer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-23 · Hoxsey (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
40.1%
79W–118L · 46.9% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
50 matches
#2 Singles
9%
19 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams