← Search

Kelly Blandford

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 21W–39L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kelly Blandford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2026-07-14 · SBarden (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Rasberry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · SBarden (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Rasberry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · SBarden (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Tringali mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · SBarden (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Malecki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-19 · SBarden (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Barden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-27 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-30 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Lindley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-03-26 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth McGregor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-31 · SPurdy (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-12-11 · SPurdy (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Lindley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-19 · SPurdy (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-10 · SPurdy (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Lindley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 53.4% of games
3.5
15.8%
3W–16L · 37.9% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 65.8% of games
6.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 41.4% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova