← Search

Jillian Fetzner

Chagrin Falls, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 100W–37L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jillian Fetzner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
W
2026-07-20 · A18 4.0W WE Niehenke · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Ries
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-06 · A18 4.0W WE Niehenke · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Ayyappan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-02 · A18 3.5W WE Ayyappan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Clegg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · A18 3.5W WE Ayyappan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kasie Burgess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · A18 3.5W WE Ayyappan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Niehenke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-18 · A18 4.0W WE Niehenke · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-14 · A18 3.5W WE Ayyappan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Niehenke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-05-11 · A18 4.0W WE Niehenke · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Yuhas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · Entry Tri W WE Strawser · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kasia Rubin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-03-13 · A18 4.0W WE Niehenke · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Ries
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-21 · C 6.5W WE Allan · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Suglia-Isgro
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-10-19 · C 6.5W WE Allan · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Suglia-Isgro
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 70.5% of games
3.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 64.5% of games
3.5
56.2%
18W–14L · 53.7% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 50.6% of games
5.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 59.3% of games
6.5
82.5%
33W–7L · 64.3% of games
7.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 61.3% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
19 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe