← Search

Patricia Mercuri

— year-end
292 matches · 172W–120L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Patricia Mercuri to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history292 matches
W
2026-07-12 · X18 8.0 MV Smith · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andre Guzman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · A40 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Kanetsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · A40 3.5W MV2 Gustafson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Aranavage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-29 · A18 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolann Sterkenburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · X18 8.0 MV Smith · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andre Guzman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-25 · A18 3.5W MV1 Kanetsky · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Kanetsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · A40 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yulia Lyublinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-22 · A18 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolann Sterkenburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-21 · X18 8.0 MV Smith · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Atwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-05 · X18 7.0 2 MV3 Nguyen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Mercuri mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W MV1 Kanetsky · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Kanetsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · A40 3.5W MV2 Gustafson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Aranavage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams75 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
72.4%
76W–29L · 58.1% of games
4.0
24.2%
8W–25L · 42.9% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 62.4% of games
7.0
75%
18W–6L · 57.2% of games
7.5
48.6%
17W–18L · 49.4% of games
8.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 35.9% of games
7.0mixed
73.7%
28W–10L · 58.1% of games
7.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 62.8% of games
8.0mixed
41.2%
14W–20L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
131 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
96 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
56 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King