← Search

Heather Young

Arvada, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 65W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Heather Young to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
W
2026-08-24 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-6
W
2026-07-22 · NJ TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-20 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · NJ NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Steve Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · NJ TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-13 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Rebecca Jones
2026-07-08 · NJ TEAL · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-22 · NJ GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-21 · NJ GOLD · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abbey Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Garrido
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.7% of games
3.0
47.2%
42W–47L · 48.7% of games
5.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 36.2% of games
6.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 62.7% of games
6.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
37 matches
#1 Singles
24%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
24 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe