← Search

Abbey Wood

Golden, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 48W–28L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Abbey Wood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Davis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Laura Garrido championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
Sarah Howlett / Kelly Anderson
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Tanya Hartney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · NJ TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tanya Hartney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-13 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Loehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-06 · NJ GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Tomlinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-17 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-15 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-03 · NJ PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Tomlinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-01 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Walters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-28 · NJ ORANGE · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-27 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tanya Hartney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 64.8% of games
3.0
58.8%
30W–21L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
22 matches
#1 Singles
28%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert